Measuring anti-spike IgG Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59058/jaimc.v21i2.115Keywords:
Immunoglobulin G, Hemodialysis, SARS-CoV-2 vaccinationAbstract
The current state of the evidence is equivocal for IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hemodialysis patients. Here, we assess the immune response in hemodialysis patients who have received a complete series of vaccines with or without a history of prior COVID infection irrespective of the vaccine administered. In this cross-sectional study, we obtained serum samples from Hemodialysis patients (n = 101). Our study found that nearly three-quarters of patients (72.2%) had two doses of either Sinovac or Sinopharm vaccine administered, and ninety-seven percent of participants were considered seropositive (COVID Ab titers > 7.1 BAU/ml). Mean COVID19 spike antibody titers were 1892.4 BAU/mL and median titers were 971 BAU/mL. The comparative analysis was performed between patients who completed two-doses less than 6 months ago and more than 6 months ago when their antibody levels were measured. Mean and median antibody titers were 1895.8 and 792 BAU/mL in the former group compared to 1981.1 and 1033 BAU/mL respectively (P value 0.84) in the latter group, indicating no significant difference. There were also no statistically significant differences in IgG antibodies among subgroups defined by diabetes, hypertension, CAD or gender. However, older patients (age >55 years) had significantly higher anti-spike antibody titers as compared to younger patients (2417.8 BAU/mL vs 1377.3 BAU/mL, P value 0.008). The result of this study provides important evidence, which can lead to vaccine efficacy especially in older populations. Future studies should address whether booster vaccination may play a role in providing an effective and long-lasting protection among vulnerable patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sidra Cheema, Numan Javed, Samreen Gilani, Manal Cheema, Zain Tariq, Zeeshan Butt, Shafiq Cheema
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles published in this journal come under creative commons licence Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) which allows to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially under following terms.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The editorial board of the Journal strives hard for the authenticity and accuracy of the material published in the Journal. However, findings and statements are views of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of the Editorial Board. Many software like (Google Maps, Google Earth, Biorender (free version)) restricts the free distribution of materials prepared using these softwares. Therefore, authors are strongly advised to check the license/copyright information of the software used to prepare maps/images. In case of publication of copyright material, the correction will be published in one of the subsequent issues of the Journal, and the authors will bear the printing cost.