Current Trends of Resistance Among Gram Negative and Gram Positive Bacteria Isolated from Tertiary Care Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59058/jaimc.v21i4.124Keywords:
Nosocomial infections, Antimicrobial resistance, AntibiogramAbstract
Background and Objectives: Nosocomial infections (NIs) following antimicrobial resistance has become serious public health concern across the world. It affects the length of hospital stay and cost burden on the health care system. Rapid increase in resistance against commonly used antibiotics results in emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms. This study was conducted to assess the current resistance pattern of gram positive and gram negative bacteria isolated from clinical samples of a tertiary care hospital.
Methods: This retrospective study was done at CMH Sialkot over the period of six months. All types of clinical samples were included and were processed by using standard microbiological procedures. Organisms were identified by using different biochemical tests. AST were performed by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method on MH agar according to CLSI guidelines.
Results: Total 402 organisms were isolated among which 57% were gram positive while 43% were Gram negative bacteria. MRSA (31%) was most prevalent in Gram positive bacteria while E.Coli(50%) was found to be most common in Gram negative bacteria. Gram-positive bacteria showed maximum resistance against Fluoroquinolones, while Co-trimoxazole and Cephalosporins were least susceptible against Gram-negative bacteria.
Conclusion: Because of the clinical burden and importance of nosocomial infections, antibiotic usage policies should be considered and implemented on a priority basis in the agenda of the infection control committees of hospitals.
Key words: Nosocomial infections, antimicrobial sensitivity testing, Mueller-Hinton agar, Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Yar Yar, Farhan Rasheed, Asma Ejaz, Iqra Jamil, Babar Yasin, Muhammad Bilal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles published in this journal come under creative commons licence Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) which allows to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially under following terms.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The editorial board of the Journal strives hard for the authenticity and accuracy of the material published in the Journal. However, findings and statements are views of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of the Editorial Board. Many software like (Google Maps, Google Earth, Biorender (free version)) restricts the free distribution of materials prepared using these softwares. Therefore, authors are strongly advised to check the license/copyright information of the software used to prepare maps/images. In case of publication of copyright material, the correction will be published in one of the subsequent issues of the Journal, and the authors will bear the printing cost.