Comparison of Outcome of SAC Ligation Versus No SAC Ligation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Orchidopexy for Incompletely Descended Palpable Testes: A Randomized Control Trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59058/jaimc.v21i4.256Keywords:
Orchidopexy, undescended testes, testicular atrophy, inguinal hernia, recurrenceAbstract
Background and Objective: The case of undescended Testis (UDT) is one of the most common condition presented to a pediatric surgeon. The standard procedure to rectify UDT is known as Orchidopexy. The main objective of this study is to examine and compare the results of orchidopexy surgeries conducted with or without sac ligation in palpable undescended testis of pediatric patients.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial was done over a period of 12 months (July 2018 to July 2019) at
the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital & Institute of Child Health, Lahore. The selection of cases was made dependent upon fulfillment of departmental criteria and approval by ethical review committee. Consequently, 280 cases divided into two equal groups i.e. Group-A and Group-B (140 cases in each group) were shortlisted for the study after detailed scrutiny. The allotment of patient to above mentioned groups was randomized by lottery method. The patients in Group-A underwent orchidopexy with ligation of sac while the patients of Group-B were operated without sac ligated. The surgeries were performed under general anesthesia by consultant surgeons of same caliber and competence. Moreover, in order to quantify and analyze the results of surgeries parameters such as Mean Operative Time, Postoperative Manifestations and recurrence of UDT were recorded on proforma. Subsequently, SPSS version 25 statistical software was utilized for calculating the mean and standard deviation of numerical variables such as age and operative time. Additionally, the frequency and percentage of variables such as recurrent UDT were also calculated. Chi-square test was applied to recurrent UDT and development of inguinal hernia. It is highlighted that P-
value ≤0.05 was taken as significant.
Results: Among 140 patients of sac ligation group, 40.7% were 1-4 years old and among 140 patients of no
sac ligation group, 42.9% were 1-4 years old. In sac ligation group, 60.0% patients had right undescended testis while in no sac ligation group, 67.1% patients had right undescended testis. In sac ligation group, the mean operative time was 37.81 + 8.82 minutes while in non-sac ligation group; the mean operative time was
24.34 + 4.12 minutes. In sac ligation group, no patient had post-operative hernia while in non-sac ligation group, 1.4% patients had post-operative hernia (p=0.15). In sac ligation group, 1.4% patients had recurrent UDT while in non-sac ligation group, 2.1% patients had recurrence. (p= 0.65)
Conclusion: Study concluded that non-sac ligation technique is more effective than sac ligation technique in
terms of operative time and should be preferred for patients by surgeons.
Keywords: Orchidopexy, undescended testes, testicular atrophy, inguinal hernia, recurrence
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Wajeeh ur Rehman, Muhammad Shafqat, Imran Hashim, Soban Hameed, Asif Iqbal, Nabila Talat, Muhammad Saleem, Anoshia Shakeel, Muhammad Sarwar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles published in this journal come under creative commons licence Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) which allows to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially under following terms.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The editorial board of the Journal strives hard for the authenticity and accuracy of the material published in the Journal. However, findings and statements are views of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of the Editorial Board. Many software like (Google Maps, Google Earth, Biorender (free version)) restricts the free distribution of materials prepared using these softwares. Therefore, authors are strongly advised to check the license/copyright information of the software used to prepare maps/images. In case of publication of copyright material, the correction will be published in one of the subsequent issues of the Journal, and the authors will bear the printing cost.